Assessed student work
Mathematics SL and HL teacher support material

Criterion |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E (SL) |
E (HL) |
Total (SL) |
Total (HL) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Achievement level awarded |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
11 |
9 |

Maximum possible achievement level |
4 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
20 |
20 |

A2—There is an aim and a rationale in an introduction, but there is a lack of explanations throughout. For example, on page 4, where do the numbers in the table come from? The diagrams do not aid the explanations very much.

B2—There is inconsistent use of terminology, for example, “root or zero” on page 7. There is some appropriate use of ICT tools.

C2—The student does apply some unfamiliar mathematics, and some research has taken place. Some examples were created, but not followed through.

D1—There is very limited and superficial reflection. Opportunities for reflection were not taken.

E4—The mathematics used is mostly correct. The student can apply the method, but there is no evidence of understanding why it works.

E2—There is partial, rather than good, understanding.